SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited v Kassim Wekhoba Toloi & another [2019] KEELRC 2454 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2454 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2454
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2454 (KLR)
Decided
24 January 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCorampresiding judge
Holding

The court finds that the 2nd Respondent, Kenya Power & Lighting Company, did not have a duty to provide information to the public about the danger of electricity and that the responsibility for the live wires being at the scene of the accident lay with the employer, Sino Hydro Corporation Limited.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Kassim Wekhoba Toloi, was an employee of Sino Hydro Corporation Limited. He was assigned to clear logs of woods that had blocked a bridge under construction. While operating a crane, he inadvertently touched an overhead power cable, resulting in electrocution.

Issues

  1. Responsibility for the live wires being at the scene of the accident
  2. Employer's duty to ensure the site was safe before sending the employee to carry out the works

Reasoning

The court re-evaluated the evidence and found that the learned magistrate erred in finding the 2nd Respondent responsible for the live wires being at the scene of the accident. The court concluded that the employer's duty to ensure the site was safe before sending the employee to carry out the works was not met.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Selle –VS- Associated Motor Boat Company [1968] E.A 123
  • Jabane –VS- Olenja [1986] KLR 601
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case