SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ephantus Githui v Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Scheme [2019] KEELRC 2532 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2532 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2532
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2532 (KLR)
Decided
18 January 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnlawful and Unfair DismissalPostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramHon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango
Holding

The Court found the termination of the Claimant's employment to be unfair due to the lack of due process and the absence of reasons for termination.

Facts

The Claimant, Ephantus Githui, was employed as a Finance Manager by the Respondent, Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Scheme. He was terminated on February 6, 2012, without being given reasons for the termination. The Claimant filed a lawsuit seeking compensation and other reliefs.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant's employment was unlawfully and unfairly terminated.
  2. Whether the Claimant has a successful case for Defamation.

Reasoning

The Employment Act requires employers to provide reasons for termination, and the Respondent failed to do so. The Court also noted that the disciplinary procedure was not followed, leading to an unfair termination.

Outcome

The Court dismissed the Respondent's case and ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant compensation and other relief as per the judgment.

Orders

  • The Respondent to pay the Claimant Kshs.12,193,301.60 in compensation and other costs as per the judgment.

Remedies

  • Declaration of unfair termination
  • Compensation for unlawful termination
  • Interest on the sums claimed
  • Costs of the case

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme Regulations
Cases cited (1)
  • Mary Chemweno Kiptui v Kenya Pipeline Company Limited (2014) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case