SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Hotel Royal Orchid [2019] KEELRC 2595 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2595 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2595
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2595 (KLR)
Decided
22 November 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureAppeal from a Labour Relations Court decisionCoramAbuodha Jorum Nelson
The Court will decline to grant orders sought and dismiss the suit however with no order as to costs.

Facts

The Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union (Claimant) sought recognition agreement from Hotel Royal Orchid (Respondent) to negotiate a collective bargaining agreement. The Respondent had a valid recognition agreement and CBA with another party (Kudheiha). The Claimant claimed to have recruited 75% of unionisable employees.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant has recruited the necessary simple majority required under section 54(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007.
  • Whether the Respondent can have two recognition agreements and CBA running concurrently with regard to unionisable employees.

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent had a valid recognition agreement and CBA with another party, and that the Claimant had not recruited the necessary simple majority required under section 54(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007. The Court also stated that no employer or association of employers can have two recognition agreements and CBA running concurrently with regard to unionisable employees.

Outcome

Dismissal of the suit with no order as to costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • KHAMU vs ALI (2015) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case