SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Christine Mbithe Muindu & 39 others v Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited [2019] KEELRC 268 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 268 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
268
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 268 (KLR)
Decided
22 November 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPosturePetition dismissed with no orders for costsCoramMAUREEN ONYANGO, TH PETITIONER, KARAN, PAUL
Holding

The Petition is time barred and the Petition is dismissed with no orders for costs.

Facts

The petitioners ceased to be employed around 6 years ago and filed a petition alleging contravention of fundamental freedoms in Articles 20, 21, 27, 41, 43 and 47 of the Constitution of Kenya and contravention of the Constitution in Articles 2, 3 and 10 of the Constitution of Kenya.

Issues

  1. Whether the Petition is time barred.
  2. Whether the Petition as filed raises constitutional issues.

Reasoning

The Respondent submitted that the Petition is time barred as the Petitioners ceased to be employed around 6 years ago and the Employment Act requires an aggrieved party to institute employment and labour relations proceedings within 3 years of the act, neglect or default complained of. The Petitioners approached the court by way of petition to circumvent the provisions on limitation in Section 90 of the Employment Act.

Outcome

Dismissed with no orders for costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment Act (No. 7 of 2007)
  • Section 90 of the Employment Act
  • Section 5(3) of the Employment Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Gabriel Mutava and 2 Others –V- Managing Director Kenya Ports Authority and Another (supra)
  • Peter Lubale Lubullellah vs. Kenya National Union of Teachers (2017) eKLR
  • Peter Ndegwa Nderitu vs. Teachers Service Commission (2017) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case