SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Thierry Poussard v Bradley Limited [2019] KEELRC 311 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 311 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
311
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 311 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
Holding

Claimant's termination was found to be unfair due to lack of due process and valid reasons.

Facts

Claimant Thierry Poussard was employed by Respondent Bradley Limited as Head of Sales and Distribution. He served for 8 months before being terminated on September 14, 2017. Claimant filed a suit seeking various remedies including salary in lieu of notice, school fees benefit, and travel reimbursement.

Issues

  1. termination of employment
  2. unlawfulness
  3. unfairness
  4. due process
  5. wrongful dismissal

Reasoning

The court found that the termination was not supported by valid reasons and that the Claimant was not given the opportunity to respond to the charges.

Outcome

Claimant's case was successful, and he was awarded 3 months' salary in lieu of notice, 6 months' salary for unfair termination, and 28 months' salary for the remaining term of the contract.

Orders

  • Award of 3 months' salary in lieu of notice
  • Award of 6 months' salary for unfair termination
  • Award of 28 months' salary for the remaining term of the contract
  • Supply of Certificate of Service
  • Payment of costs and interest

Remedies

  • Salary in lieu of notice
  • Compensation for unfair termination
  • School fees benefit
  • Travel reimbursement

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case