Elam Lumwaji t/a Domicile Auctioneers v Securex Agencies (K) Ltd [2019] KEELRC 359 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 359
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 359 (KLR)
- Decided
- 8 November 2019
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCosts ExecutionPostureApplicant seeks leave to execute for costsCoramRadido Stephen
Holding
The Court allows the application filed by the applicant to execute the bill of costs with costs
Facts
The applicant auctioneer filed a bill of costs against the respondent Securex Agencies (K) Ltd out of warrants issued in Cause No. 1228 of 2014. The bill of costs was taxed in the sum of Kshs 128,330/-.
Issues
- Whether the applicant can execute the bill of costs against the respondent
- Whether the respondent was represented when the application was heard
Reasoning
The Court found that the respondent did not defend the application and that the Auctioneers Act and Rules place an obligation on the debtor to pay the auctioneer's charges.
Outcome
The application is allowed with costs
Orders
- The Court allows the applicant to execute the bill of costs with costs
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- Auctioneers Act
- Auctioneers Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…