SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Valentine Ataka v Karatina University [2019] KEELRC 445 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 445 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
445
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 445 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDetermination of Employment Contract and PaymentPostureClaimant vs Respondent (University)CoramNzioki wa Makau
Holding

The court finds in favor of the Claimant, Valentine Ataka, and orders the Respondent, Karatina University, to pay the Claimant Kshs. 195,000 gross pay and costs on the sum of Kshs. 413,400.

Facts

Claimant sued the Respondent (Karatina University) for various employment issues, including failure to pay contractual dues, failure to issue written employment contract, failure to issue a certificate of service, unfair labour practices, and unfair wages. Claimant alleged that he was employed to teach 8 courses but was not given a contract of employment and was not paid for the courses he taught.

Issues

  1. Validity of part-time employment contracts
  2. Fair remuneration
  3. Termination of employment
  4. Fair labour practices
  5. Payment of overdue wages

Reasoning

The court ruled that the Claimant was engaged on a part-time basis and was entitled to the agreed remuneration for the courses he taught. The court also ordered the Respondent to pay the outstanding sum of Kshs. 195,000 gross.

Outcome

In favor of the Claimant

Orders

  • Payment of Kshs. 195,000 gross pay
  • Payment of costs on the sum of Kshs. 413,400

Remedies

  • Payment of outstanding wages
  • Payment of costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Part-Time Work Convention, 1994 (No. 175)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case