SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rachel Mutheu Ndambuki v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning & 2 others [2019] KEELRC 524 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 524 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
524
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 524 (KLR)
Decided
25 October 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeContempt of CourtPosturePetitioner seeks to find Cabinet Secretary in contempt and order her arrest for 6 monthsCoramJames Rika
The Cabinet Secretary is found in contempt and granted an opportunity to purge the contempt

Facts

Petitioner was transferred to Garissa Survey Department, then Justice Kiprono Korir took over her office and locked it. Petitioner filed an application for contempt.

Issues

  • Contempt of Court
  • Transfer of Office
  • Maternity Leave

Reasoning

The Cabinet Secretary's actions were in contempt of the court's order and the court seeks to protect its dignity and integrity.

Outcome

The Cabinet Secretary is found in contempt and granted an opportunity to purge the contempt

Orders

  • Reversing the transfer of Justice Kiprono Korir
  • Communicating to the Petitioner that she remains Officer In-Charge until further orders
  • Ensuring the Petitioner takes physical occupation of her office upon her return from maternity
  • Moving the Court to confirm contempt or set a date for sentencing

Remedies

  • Reversing the transfer
  • Communicating to the Petitioner
  • Ensuring physical occupation of office
  • Confirming contempt or sentencing
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case