SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Francis Kigalu v Headteacher Musasa Primary School & another [2019] KEELRC 684 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 684 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
684
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 684 (KLR)
Decided
9 October 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnlawful DismissalPostureClaimant vs. Respondents (Headteacher and Management Committee of Musasa Primary School)CoramMathews N. Nduma
Holding

The dismissal of the claimant was unlawful and unfair, and the claimant is entitled to compensation in the sum of Kshs. 39,000 with interest.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a security officer and was suspended by the headteacher on July 8, 2015, without a valid reason. The claimant was not paid his salary for May and June 2015, and the respondent denied this. The claimant was later arrested and charged falsely, but was acquitted.

Issues

  1. Unlawful dismissal
  2. Compensation for unlawful dismissal
  3. Underpayment of salary
  4. Violation of minimum wage requirements
  5. Victimization for requesting payment of arrear salary

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent violated the Employment Act by dismissing the claimant without a valid reason and without following a fair procedure. The claimant was not given notice, notice to show cause, or a disciplinary hearing.

Outcome

In favour of the claimant

Orders

  • Claimant is awarded Kshs. 39,000 in compensation with interest
  • Respondent to pay costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Compensation for unlawful dismissal
  • Payment of underpaid salary
  • Payment of terminal benefits

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case