SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Robert Karani v Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (Petition 56 of 2015) [2020] KEELRC 1025 (KLR) (Employment and Labour) (29 May 2020) (Judgment)

[2020] KEELRC 1025 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1025
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1025 (KLR)
Decided
29 May 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureAppeal from original trialCoramRadido Stephen
Holding

The Petitioner's contract was terminated unilaterally and arbitrarily by the Chief Executive Officer, violating the law.

Facts

Petitioner was offered employment as an Operations Assistant by the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission, which was later succeeded by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission. The contract was for 3 years with a 12-month extension. The Petitioner was appraised multiple times and had a work-related issue with a Principal Administrative Officer over an official vehicle accident. The Commission later terminated his contract due to career development concerns.

Issues

  1. Constitutional violations
  2. Unlawful termination of employment
  3. Discrimination
  4. Freedom and security of the person
  5. Fair labour practices
  6. Fair administrative action

Reasoning

The Court found that the termination was not justified and violated the Petitioner's rights to freedom and security of the person, fair labour practices, and fair administrative action.

Outcome

The Petitioner was awarded compensation of Kshs 620,000 and costs on a half-scale.

Orders

  • A declaration that the Chief Executive Officer violated the law by unilaterally and arbitrarily terminating the Petitioner's contract of employment.
  • Compensation of Kshs 620,000

Remedies

  • A declaration that the Petitioner's freedom and security of the person was violated.
  • A declaration that the Petitioner's right to equality and freedom from discrimination was violated.
  • A declaration that the Petitioner's right to fair labour practices was violated.
  • A declaration that the Petitioner's right to fair administrative action was violated.
  • An order expunging from records all emails/letters that are inaccurate and false.
  • General damages for violation of the Petitioner's constitutional rights and freedoms.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case