SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Job Madede v Acacia Ventures Limited [2020] KEELRC 1079 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1079 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1079
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1079 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour DisputePostureRespondent's AppealCoramMathews N. Nduma
Holding

The objection has merit and the warrant of attachment is lifted, and the motor vehicle is released to the objector.

Facts

The Claimant purchased a motor vehicle from Tsusho Capital Kenya and Patrick Ragot Olang, who are not parties to the suit. The vehicle was attached by Pambo Investment Auctioneers on 27th January 2020 in execution of a decree issued in this case.

Issues

  1. Whether the objector is a party to the suit
  2. Whether the attachment of the motor vehicle was lawful and in accordance with the Traffic Act

Reasoning

The motor vehicle was registered in the name of Tsusho Capital Kenya and Patrick Ragot Olang, and the objector demonstrated that the vehicle was attached by Pambo Investments Auctioneers in execution of a decree issued in this case. The claimant has not demonstrated any connection between the current and previous registered owners with Acacia Ventures Ltd.

Outcome

Appeal Granted

Orders

  • The claimant/respondent through themselves and/or their lawful agents, Pambo Investment Auctioneers, and/or employees, agents and or servants to release the objectors repossessed motor vehicle Registration Number KBW 974K, Mini Bus Hino forthwith without any conditions attached.
  • The warrant of attachment dated 27th January 2020 attaching the objector’s motor vehicle Registration Number KBW 974K Mini Bus Hino are hereby lifted.
  • The claimant/respondent to pay the costs of the objection/Application.

Remedies

  • Motor vehicle release
  • Lifting of warrant of attachment

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Traffic Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case