SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Edward Mangeni Wanyonyi & Linet Kaveha Luvisa v Jason Beagle, Amy Beagle & Jennifer Ashlock t/a Kenya Church of Christ Children Home (Cause 33 of 2014) [2020] KEELRC 1257 (KLR) (Employment and Labour) (15 April 2020) (Judgment)

[2020] KEELRC 1257 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1257
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1257 (KLR)
Decided
15 April 2020
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal DismissedCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
The Court finds the Respondents (the Respondents) improperly joined in the suit and lacks capacity to be sued, thus striking out the case with no orders as to costs.

Facts

The Claimants, Edward Mangeni Wanyonyi and Linet Kaveha Luvisa, were employed by the Respondents, Jason Beagle, Amy Beagle, and Jennifer Ashlock, to care for children at the Kenya Church of Christ Children Home. They alleged gross underpayment and wrongful dismissal.

Issues

  • Employer liability
  • Wrongful termination
  • Underpayment

Reasoning

The Court ruled that the Respondents were employees of the Kenya Church of Christ Children Home and not the employers, as the trustees were the proper parties to sue. The Court also found the Claimants improperly joined the Respondents in the suit.

Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

Orders

  • Strike out the case with no orders as to costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Trustees of the Agricultural Society of Kenya vs. James Gitonga (2017) eKLR
  • Tenesheles Trust and Others vs BDO Mann Judd (Supreme Court of the Bahamas) (16th November 2009) J. Adderly
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case