SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers v Associated Motors Limited [2020] KEELRC 1265 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1265 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1265
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1265 (KLR)
Decided
24 April 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCollective Agreement DisputePostureAppeal from original trialCoramRadido Stephen
Holding

The Court orders the parties to execute a Collective Agreement incorporating a general wage increment of 6% for 2016/2017 and 5% for 2017/2018, a 5.5% housing allowance increment, and a leave travelling allowance of Kshs 6,150/- for 2016/2018. Other terms remain as provided for in the lapsed collective agreement.

Facts

The Union and the Respondent failed to negotiate a collective agreement, leading to a trade dispute. The Union proposed an individual collective agreement, but negotiations were unsuccessful. The parties reached a conciliation meeting but no agreement was reached.

Issues

  1. Refusal to negotiate and conclude the CBA
  2. Basic wage
  3. General wage increment
  4. Leave travelling allowance
  5. Housing
  6. Redundancy
  7. Baggage allowance
  8. Funeral grant
  9. Medical expenses
  10. Acting allowance
  11. Heavy-duty allowance
  12. Disturbance allowance
  13. Commuter allowance
  14. Effective date of the Collective Agreement

Reasoning

The Court found the Union's demands for wage increments and allowances to be reasonable and within the scope of the Employment Act, 2007. The Court adopted the recommendations of the Central Planning and Monitoring Unit for housing allowance and leave travelling allowance.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • Execution of a Collective Agreement

Remedies

  • Arrears of the awards to be paid within 60 days with interest at Court rates if not paid within that period

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case