SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Okiya Omtatah Okoiti v The Board, Kenya Pipeline Company Limited & 2 others ; John Ngumi (Chairman) & 10 others (Interested Parties) [2020] KEELRC 1464 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1464 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1464
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1464 (KLR)
Decided
6 March 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional and Labour DisputePosturePetition for Constitutional and Labour DisputeCoramHon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango
Holding

The court finds no proof of violation of Article 232(1)(h) regarding the tribal composition of the KPC Board. The interview process was found to be in compliance with the law.

Facts

The petitioner, Okiya Omtatah Okoiti, challenges the constitution of the Kenya Pipeline Company (KPC) Board and the recruitment process for the new Managing Director. The 1st respondent, the Board of KPC, and other parties contest the petitioner's claims.

Issues

  1. Whether the KPC Board was properly constituted at the time of recruitment of the new Managing Director.
  2. Whether the interview process for the position of KPC Managing Director was in compliance with the Public Service Act.
  3. Whether reasonable opportunity for public participation was provided.
  4. Whether the petitioner has laid a basis for granting the orders sought.
  5. Who will bear the costs.

Reasoning

The court does not find evidence supporting the claim that 5 out of 9 KPC Board members belong to one tribe, as the petitioner did not provide evidence of their tribal origins. The court also found the interview process to be in compliance with the Public Service Act.

Outcome

The court dismisses the petition.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Public Service Act No. 10 of 2017
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Legal Advice Centre AKA Kituo Cha Sheria v Attorney General and 3 Others (2015)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case