SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Nduba v Africa Medical and Research Foundation (AMREF Health Africa) [2020] KEELRC 1685 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1685 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1685
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1685 (KLR)
Decided
7 February 2020
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramOnguto
The court held that the Claimant had a legitimate expectation of renewal of his contract based on the express promise in the contract and the HR Policy Manual. The court found that the Claimant's performance was satisfactory and that the Respondent had not fulfilled its obligation to renew the contract.

Facts

The Claimant, Dr. John Nduba, was employed by the Respondent, Africa Medical and Research Foundation (AMREF Health Africa), for a continuous period of 32 years and 2 months. His last contract was for two years from July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015, and was renewable based on his performance and the Respondent's ability to fund its operations.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant had a legitimate expectation of renewal of his contract for a further period of two years.
  • Whether the failure to renew the contract for two years amounted to unfair termination of his employment.
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought in his Claim.

Reasoning

The court agreed with the Claimant that there was a legitimate expectation of renewal based on the express promise in the contract and the HR Policy Manual. The court found that the conditions for renewal were met and that the Claimant's services were still required by the Respondent.

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the Claimant, finding that the Respondent's failure to renew the contract for two years was unfair and unlawful termination.

Orders

  • A declaration that the Respondent's failure to renew the Claimant's employment for a period of 2 years constituted an unfair labor practice and an unfair and unlawful termination of the Claimant's employment through unlawful redundancy.
  • Maximum compensation of 12 months' salary inclusive of benefits for unlawful, illegal, malicious and unfair termination of employment.
  • Severance pay at the rate of 15 days' pay, based on the Claimant's last basic salary, for each of the Claimant's 32 completed years of service.
  • General damages for unfair labor practices.
  • Costs of this suit.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Teresa Carlo Omondi vs Transparency International Kenya (2017) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case