Republic v County Government of Marsabit, Department of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries Development & 2 others; Wato Denge Halake (Interested Party) Ex-Parte Guyo Shanda Umuro [2020] KEELRC 1694 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 1694
- Citation
- [2020] KEELRC 1694 (KLR)
- Decided
- 7 February 2020
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Certiorari and ProhibitionCoramRadido Stephen
Holding
The ex-parte applicant's motion is dismissed with no order on costs.
Facts
The ex-parte applicant was initially appointed as a County Project Team Leader but was later recalled to his position as Chief Veterinary Officer. He contested the recall, alleging lack of due process and breach of his right to fair administrative action.
Issues
- Was the ex-parte applicant entitled to a hearing before the recall from the Project?
- Did the recall breach his constitutional rights and freedoms?
Reasoning
The Court found that the ex-parte applicant was a permanent employee subject to the terms and conditions of service set by the County Public Service Board. The recall was a legitimate exercise of the employer's authority, and the ex-parte applicant was not entitled to a hearing before the recall.
Outcome
Motion dismissed with no order on costs
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- County Governments Act
- Law Reform Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…