SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bismark Sammy Mwendwa v Likat Boutique Limited [2020] KEELRC 1767 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1767 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1767
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1767 (KLR)
Decided
16 January 2020
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair and Unjustified TerminationPostureClaimant seeks declaration of unlawful summary dismissal and payment of terminal dues and compensatory damagesCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
Termination was unfair and unjustified, awarding 1 month salary in lieu of notice, 8 months' salary as compensation, and payment for leave not taken

Facts

Claimant was arrested and released on cash bail for alleged theft, then never called to resume duties. He filed suit alleging unfair termination and seeking compensation.

Issues

  • Unlawful summary dismissal
  • Payment of terminal dues and compensatory damages
  • Notice pay
  • Untaken/unpaid leave

Reasoning

Claimant was never given a reason for termination and no disciplinary process was followed, while Respondent claimed he absconded duty.

Outcome

Claimant wins

Orders

  • 1 month salary in lieu of notice
  • 8 months' salary as compensation
  • Payment for leave not taken
  • Costs of the suit

Remedies

  • 1 month salary in lieu of notice
  • 8 months' salary as compensation
  • Payment for leave not taken
  • Costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case