SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Thomas Dzombo Kirunga v Krystalline Salt Limited [2020] KEELRC 506 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 506 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
506
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 506 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramPresiding Judge
The Claimant's dismissal was lawful and fair, and the claims for compensation and notice pay are dismissed.

Facts

The Claimant, Thomas Dzombo Kirunga, was employed by the Respondent, Krystalline Salt Limited, as a Pump Attendant from May 1997. He was dismissed on December 16, 2017, for unauthorised absence from work. The Claimant claimed wrongful and unfair dismissal, seeking compensation and other benefits.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant's dismissal was lawful and fair
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought

Reasoning

The dismissal was for unauthorised absence, and the Respondent provided a show cause letter and a disciplinary hearing. The Claimant's contradictory statements and failure to notify his employer of his whereabouts during the absence were valid reasons for dismissal.

Outcome

The Claimant's claims for compensation and notice pay are dismissed. The claim for unutilized leave pay is admitted and payable.

Remedies

  • Salary for the month of December 2017
  • Any accrued and unutilized leave
  • Less one month salary in lieu of notice
  • Unutilized leave pay

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
Cases cited (3)
  • Nicholas Otinyu Muruka v Equity Bank Limited
  • Banking, Insurance & Finance Union (Kenya) v Barclays Bank of Kenya Ltd
  • Evans Musyoki Mutua v Shreeji Enterprises (K) Ltd
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case