SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Zakaria Auma Samuel Otieno Odero v Kaluworks Limited [2020] KEELRC 671 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 671 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
671
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 671 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's claim against former employerCoramRika
Holding

The dismissal was lawful and fair, and the procedural fairness requirements of Section 41 of the Employment Act were satisfied.

Facts

Claimant Zakaria Auma Samuel Otieno Odero was employed by Kaluworks Limited from September 2003 to September 2013. He was dismissed on October 30, 2015, due to poor performance and gross negligence.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant's dismissal was lawful and fair
  2. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought

Reasoning

The Respondent took steps to support the Claimant to improve his performance through training and one-on-one interaction. The Claimant was duly notified of the disciplinary hearing and participated in it.

Outcome

Dismissal was lawful and fair

Remedies

  • One month's salary in lieu of notice
  • Unpaid salary for the month of October
  • Leave pay for 58 days
  • Outstanding travel allowance
  • Severance pay
  • 12 months' salary in compensation
  • Certificate of service
  • Costs plus interest

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (2)
  • Kenya Science Research International Technical and Allied Workers Union (KSRITAWU) v Stanley Kinyanjui and Magnate Ventures (Cause No 273 0f 2010)
  • Jacob Oriando Ochanda v Kenya Hospital Association T/A Nairobi Hospital [2019] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case