SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Kinene Muraguri v Raffia Bags (East Africa) Limited [2020] KEELRC 686 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 686 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
686
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 686 (KLR)
Decided
7 May 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
Typeemployment disputePostureoriginal trialCoramMaraga, Radido
Holding

The Court found that the termination of the Claimant's employment was not lawful and fair due to the lack of proper notice and selection criteria.

Facts

The Claimant, James Kinene Muraguri, worked as a Shift Manager for Raffia Bags (East Africa) Limited from 2010 to 2012. The Respondent, Raffia Bags (East Africa) Limited, declared the Claimant redundant in 2012 and provided severance pay and other benefits. The Claimant was later rehired as a Shift Manager in 2016 but terminated again in 2016.

Issues

  1. whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was lawful and fair
  2. whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought

Reasoning

The Court determined that the termination was not in accordance with the Employment Act, 2007, as it did not comply with the statutory requirements for redundancy terminations.

Outcome

The Court found in favor of the Claimant, ordering the Respondent to pay severance pay, notice pay, and other benefits.

Orders

  • the Respondent to pay severance pay
  • the Respondent to pay notice pay
  • the Respondent to pay other benefits

Remedies

  • severance pay
  • notice pay
  • other benefits

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007
Cases cited (3)
  • Jane I Khalechi v Oxford University Press E.A. Ltd
  • Thomas De La Rue v David Opondo Omutelelma
  • Kenya Airways Limited v Aviation & Allied Workers Union of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case