SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Francis Kioko Mwaniki v Hakika Transport Services Limited [2020] KEELRC 696 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 696 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
696
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 696 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnlawful Termination of EmploymentPostureClaim for compensation and notice pay dismissed; Respondent's counterclaim for notice pay dismissedCoramRika
The Claimant has failed to establish a case of unlawful termination of employment and the claims for compensation and notice pay are dismissed.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a Heavy Commercial Driver by Respondent from July 2013 until April 2015. He claimed unlawful termination and compensation for leave pay and service pay.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant has made out a case of unlawful termination of employment
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought
  • Whether the Respondent has made out a proper counterclaim against the Claimant

Reasoning

The Claimant could not provide the exact date of termination and failed to prove that the termination was unlawful. The Court found that the employee's pay structure was unique to the industry and not compatible with annual leave.

Outcome

Both the Claimant's claim and the Respondent's counterclaim are dismissed.

Orders

  • Each party will bear their own costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Mwona Mwaiwe Mwaono & 4 others v Hakika Transport Services Limited [2019] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case