SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Teresiah Wanjiru Ndegwa v Barclays Bank Limited [2020] KEELRC 77 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 77 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
77
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 77 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour DisputePostureRespondent's Application for Stay of Execution and Setting Aside of Decree and WarrantsCoramHon Lady Justice Hellen Wasilwa
Holding

The court finds that the decree is not in tandem with the Judgment and that the applicants have proceeded to carry out execution despite the absence of a draft decree.

Facts

The applicant, Teresiah Wanjiru Ndegwa, sought orders to stay execution and set aside a decree and warrants issued by the Deputy Registrar, claiming irregularity and errors in the assessment of costs.

Issues

  1. Irregularity of the decree and warrants
  2. Failure to afford the other party an opportunity to consider and approve a draft decree
  3. Interest on the decretal sum

Reasoning

The court held that the court did not pronounce the issue of interest in the decretal sum in its Judgment, thus Section 26(2) of the CPA came into play, ordering interest at 6% per annum.

Outcome

The court allowed the respondents to correct their mistake and share a draft decree for payment, with the applicants to proceed with execution if there is no payment.

Orders

  • Allow the respondents to correct their mistake and share a draft decree for payment
  • Give the respondents 2 weeks to correct this omission

Remedies

  • Allow execution to proceed if there is no payment

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Section 26(2) of the CPA
Cases cited (2)
  • David Makau vs Muau Ndenda CA 72 of 2004
  • BOG Tambach Teachers Training College
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case