SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ruth Adhiambo Apindi v Unilever Kenya Limited [2020] KEELRC 926 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 926 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
926
Citation
[2020] KEELRC 926 (KLR)
Decided
28 May 2020
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair DismissalPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
The Court found that the termination of employment was unfair and unjust, and awarded the Claimant compensation for the unfair dismissal.

Facts

The Claimant was employed by Unilever Kenya Limited as a Buying Assistant – IP, Kenya. She was initially placed on probation and later promoted. She was suspended on 28th October, 2014, and her services were terminated on 28th November, 2014. She claimed unfair dismissal and the unlawful withholding of her pension.

Issues

  • Whether the termination of employment was fair and just
  • Whether the Claimant owed the Respondent money for a car loan

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent failed to prove that the reason for the termination was valid, fair, or based on operational requirements.

Outcome

The Claimant was awarded compensation for the unfair dismissal and salary arrears.

Orders

  • 1 month salary in lieu of notice
  • 9 months' salary as compensation for the unfair dismissal
  • 18 days leave outstanding at the time of termination
  • Salary arrears for December 2014
  • Free to collect her pension
  • Respondent to pay costs of this suit plus interest at Court rates with effect from the date of this judgment.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case