SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Muriithi Njogu v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Advisory Board [2021] KEELRC 1162 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1162 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1162
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1162 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetition for Infringement of Constitutional RightsPostureRespondent seeks to re-open the matter, Petitioner responds within 14 daysCoramNzioki wa Makau
The Petitioner may respond to the Motion within 14 days, and the matter is deferred pending the resolution of the Respondents' Notice of Motion application

Facts

Not explicitly stated in the provided text

Issues

  • Constitutional violations
  • Administrative actions
  • HR Manual
  • Training Bond

Reasoning

The advanced stage of proceedings and the acknowledgment of submissions by the Respondents justify the Petitioner's response within 14 days

Outcome

The matter is deferred pending the resolution of the Respondents' Notice of Motion application

Orders

  • Petitioner to respond to the Motion within 14 days
  • Mention set for 12th August, 2021 to confirm filing of response
  • Application to be heard in the new term on 20th September, 2021

Authorities cited

Legislation (6)
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act, No. 4 of 2015
  • Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Practice and Procedure Rules, 2016)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Guidelines on the Bond for Training Public Servants, 2018
  • ODPP Human Resource Manual, 2013
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case