SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jackson Mainga Mtungi v Shiva Carriers Limited [2021] KEELRC 1183 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1183 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1183
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1183 (KLR)
Decided
23 July 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair TerminationPostureAppeal from original trialCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The termination was not unfair and the claimant is entitled to compensation for annual leave and 25% of the costs of the suit.

Facts

The claimant, Jackson Mainga Mtungi, was employed as a Heavy Commercial Driver by Shiva Carriers Limited from January 17, 2014, to June 10, 2015. He was terminated on June 10, 2015, for gross misconduct. The claimant alleged he worked overtime without pay, had no offs, worked on public holidays, and was not a member of NSSF.

Issues

  • Whether the contract of service was terminated by the letter of summary dismissal
  • Whether the termination was unfair
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to the remedies as prayed for

Reasoning

The Court found that the termination was due to gross misconduct and the claimant fully contributed to his dismissal. The claimant did not provide evidence of grievances or invoke the grievance procedure, making the claims for overtime pay, rest days, and house allowance unfounded. The claimant was a member of NSSF and thus not entitled to service pay.

Outcome

Judgment for the claimant for compensation for annual leave and 25% of the costs of the suit.

Orders

  • The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs. 30, 751.245 for annual leave by September 1, 2021, failing interest to be payable at Court rates.
  • The respondent to pay the claimant's 25% of the costs of the suit.

Remedies

  • Annual leave compensation

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Section 44(1) of the Employment Act, 2007
  • Section 28 of the Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case