SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Okiya Omtatah Okoiti v Parliamentary Service Commission & another [2021] KEELRC 1471 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1471 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1471
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1471 (KLR)
Decided
8 June 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetition for Preliminary ObjectionsPostureRespondents filed Notices of Preliminary ObjectionsCoramCA
The court has jurisdiction over the matter and the petitioner has locus standi to file the petition.

Facts

The petitioner alleges that the 1st respondent (Parliamentary Service Commission) violated the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act by appointing the 2nd respondent (Michael Rotich Sialai) as the Clerk of the National Assembly without House approval and after attaining mandatory retirement age.

Issues

  • Court's jurisdiction
  • Petitioner's locus standi
  • Exhaustion of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
  • Constitutional violations

Reasoning

The court's jurisdiction is derived from Article 162(2)(a) and (3) of the Constitution, 2010, which grants the court jurisdiction over employment and labour relations disputes. The court also determined that the petitioner has the right to file the petition.

Outcome

The petition is allowed to proceed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011
  • Parliamentary Service Commission Act
Cases cited (4)
  • Owner of the Motor Vessel Lillian 'S' V Caltex Oil Kenya Ltd. (1989) 1 KLR
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia v Kenya Commercial Bank & 2 others [2012] eKLR
  • Olive Mwihaki Mugenda & another v Okiya Omtatah Okoiti & 4 others [2016] eKLR
  • Speaker of Senate & another v Attorney General & 4 others Reference Number 2 of 2013 [2013] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case