SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Private Universities Workers Union v Mt. Kenya University [2021] KEELRC 1541 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1541 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1541
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1541 (KLR)
Decided
18 June 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour DisputePostureAppeal from a Labour Relations Court decisionCoramJAMES RIKA
The Preliminary Objection is misconceived. The Claimant Union does not have to be formally recognized by the Respondent University to access Unionisable Members in its recruitment drive. The Respondent is only required to open its gates to the Claimant Union.

Facts

The Claimant Union filed an Application seeking access to Unionisable Employees of the Respondent University for recruitment purposes. The Respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection stating it does not have a Recognition Agreement with the Claimant Union.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant Union has to be formally recognized by the Respondent University to access Unionisable Members in its recruitment drive.
  • Whether the Respondent has an unqualified obligation to facilitate the Claimant Union in its recruitment drive.
  • Whether the demands made by the Claimant Union are unreasonable and border on the bizarre.

Reasoning

Recognition can only be achieved if there is recruitment. The engagement of the Claimant Union does not have to be preceded by a Recognition Agreement. The Respondent is not obligated to facilitate the Claimant Union in its recruitment drive.

Outcome

The Preliminary Objection by the Respondent is declined. The Application by the Claimant is declined.

Orders

  • The Preliminary Objection by the Respondent is declined.
  • The Application by the Claimant is declined.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case