SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Fredrick Wanyonyi Simiyu v Acting Chief Executive Officer, Kenya Medical Supplies Authority & another [2021] KEELRC 1661 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1661 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1661
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1661 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeInterlocutory InjunctionPostureApplication for Interlocutory InjunctionCoramHon. Maureen Onyango
The Court confirmed the interlocutory injunction already issued by the Court at the exparte stage

Facts

Claimant was served with a letter of interdiction by the Respondents on 25/8/2020, alleging failure to properly advise management and divulging information to unauthorized persons. The Claimant denied these allegations.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant has satisfied the requirements for grant of an interlocutory injunction
  • Whether the Respondents have complied with their Human Resource Policies and Procedures

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondents failed to comply with their Human Resource Policies and Procedures, and the interdiction was indefinite and open-ended.

Outcome

Interlocutory injunction confirmed

Orders

  • Interlocutory injunction confirmed

Remedies

  • Interlocutory injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Kenya Medical Supplies Authority (KEMSA) Human Resource Policies and Procedures Manual
Cases cited (1)
  • Giella –vs- Cassman Brown and Company Limited [1973] E.A. 358
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case