Mwendabole v Protective Custody Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Cause E020 of 2020) [2021] KEELRC 1809 (KLR) (11 March 2021) (Ruling)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 1809
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 1809 (KLR)
- Decided
- 11 March 2021
Summary at a glance
TypeMiscellaneous Civil CausePostureRespondent opposed the applicationCoramONESMUS MAKAU
The court has the inherent jurisdiction to adopt as judgment the Director’s award for purposes of execution.
Facts
Claimant was injured while employed by Respondent and the Director of Work Injury Benefits assessed his compensation.
Issues
- Whether the court can adopt the award by the Director as judgment of the court for purposes of execution.
- Whether the Respondent's objection to the award under section 51(1) of the WIBA is valid.
Reasoning
The court holds that it has the inherent jurisdiction to adopt as judgment the Director’s award for purposes of execution, as there is no challenge mounted against the Director’s award by any party.
Outcome
The application is allowed in terms of prayers 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Orders
- Judgment be entered for the Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 671,803.50.
- Interest on the amount from the date of assessment until payment in full be awarded.
- Costs of this application be awarded to the Applicants.
Remedies
- Judgment be entered for the Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 671,803.50.
- Interest on the amount from the date of assessment until payment in full be awarded.
- Costs of this application be awarded to the Applicants.
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…