SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

George Karanja Ngunda v Meru Water and Sewerage Services (MEWASS) Registered Trustees & 3 others [2021] KEELRC 1939 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1939 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1939
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1939 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

The termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair, unprocedural, and unlawful. The Claimant is entitled to 12 months compensation for unlawful termination of employment.

Facts

The Claimant was employed as a General Manager by Meru Water and Sewerage Services (MEWASS) from December 2016 to August 2018. The County Assembly of Meru enacted the Meru County Water and Sanitation Services Act, 2014, establishing a new corporation, Meru County Urban Water and Sanitation Services Corporation, which succeeded MEWASS.

Issues

  • Was the termination of the employment of the Claimant unfair, unlawful and unprocedural?
  • Is the Claimant entitled to the relief sought?

Reasoning

The Claimant's tenure was renewable based on performance and his willingness to continue in service. The termination was unlawful and unprocedural.

Outcome

Claimant's claim is allowed.

Orders

  • A declaration that the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair, unprocedural, and unlawful.
  • Award of 12 months compensation for unlawful termination of employment.
  • Order for the Respondent to issue a Certificate of Service to the Claimant.
  • Costs to be borne by the Respondents.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case