SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Peter Otieno Okumu v Thomas & Piron Grands Lacs Ltd [2021] KEELRC 2068 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 2068 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2068
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 2068 (KLR)
Decided
24 February 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

The Court finds the Claimant was on a term contract and not casual employment basis. The Respondent unfairly terminated the Claimant’s employment.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a carpenter by Respondent from November 2015 to January 2017. The Claimant was paid on a monthly basis and had deductions from the National Social Security Fund.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant was a permanent employee of the Respondent.
  • Whether the termination of the Claimant’s employment was fair.
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The Court found the Claimant was on a term contract based on the deductions from the National Social Security Fund and the Respondent's obligation to issue a written contract. The Respondent did not provide a 1-month notice of termination.

Outcome

The Court finds the Claimant was on a term contract and not casual employment basis. The Respondent unfairly terminated the Claimant’s employment. The Claimant discharged the Respondent from further claims in consideration of payment of Kshs 10,000/-.

Orders

  • The Court finds the Claimant was on a term contract and not casual employment basis.
  • The Respondent unfairly terminated the Claimant’s employment.
  • The Claimant discharged the Respondent from further claims in consideration of payment of Kshs 10,000/-.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case