SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Mwashi Ashanji v Mshamba Housing Co-operative Society [2021] KEELRC 235 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 235 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
235
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 235 (KLR)
Decided
9 December 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureRespondent's Statement of Defence and Claimant's ResponseCoramRadido
The Court finds the Claimant was not employed by the Respondent in 2005 and is not a permanent employee. The termination was not conducted in accordance with the Employment Act.

Facts

The Claimant was employed as a casual security guard by the Respondent from September 2005 to December 2005, transitioning to permanent employment on January 1, 2006. He was dismissed on June 4, 2015, and claimed various compensations.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant was a casual or permanent employee of the Respondent and for how long
  • Whether the Claimant was unfairly terminated or absconded duty
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Court does not find evidence of the Claimant's employment in 2005 and disputes the claim of a 10-year employment. The Respondent's termination procedure was flawed, and the Claimant's testimony supports the allegation of absconding duty.

Outcome

Dismissal of the suit with costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Loice Otieno v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited
  • CMC Aviation Limited v Mohammed Noor
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case