Wago Roba Molu v Personal Systems Computer Limited [2021] KEELRC 302 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 302
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 302 (KLR)
The court held that the claimant was employed by Mr. Mahmood, not the respondent, and thus the respondent is not liable for the termination.
Facts
Claimant Wago Roba Molu alleges he was employed as a security guard by Respondent Personal Systems Computer Limited from 2000 to 2016. He claims his employment was terminated on February 28, 2016, by Mr. Mahmood. Respondent disputes the employment relationship, stating it was incorporated in 2007 and denies ever employing Claimant.
Issues
- Whether the claimant was an employee of the respondent?
- If the answer to (i) is in the affirmative, was his termination unfair and unlawful?
- What reliefs if any, avail to the claimant?
Reasoning
The court found that the claimant's testimony and evidence did not establish an employment relationship with the respondent. The respondent's certificate of incorporation was presented as evidence of its existence, which the claimant disputed.
Outcome
The court dismissed the claimant's case.
Loading judgment…