SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Amir Swaleh Omar v Mackenzie Maritime [EA] Limited [2021] KEELRC 550 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 550 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
550
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 550 (KLR)
Decided
28 October 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment & Labour RelationsPostureApplication for judgment for the amount claimedCoramAGNES M.K. NZEI
Holding

The suit should go for trial; and the application for judgment for the amount claimed is dismissed with no orders as to costs.

Facts

The Claimant Amir Swaleh Omar was employed by the Respondent Mackenzie Maritime [E.A] Limited as a Banksman since January 2018. On February 16, 2018, he was injured at his work station at Africa Oil and Gas Limited, breaking his right hip. The County Occupational Safety and Health Officer assessed his injury at 40% incapacity and awarded him Ksh.1,476,912. Dissatisfied, the Respondent requested a medical board to reassess the Claimant, who was awarded 60% permanent disablement and Ksh.2,167,138.53.

Issues

  1. Claim for compensation for diminished earning capacity under WIBA
  2. Claim for an order compelling the Respondent to settle the claim
  3. Claim for an order for conviction of the Respondent’s directors for failure to pay the compensation claimed in line with Section 26(6) of the WIBA Act

Reasoning

The Court found that there are triable and fairly urguable issues raised in the pleadings as currently filed, and the application for summary judgment is denied.

Outcome

Application dismissed with no orders as to costs

Orders

  • The suit should go for trial

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • WIBA (Work Injury and Benefit Act)
Cases cited (2)
  • Job kilach –vs- Nation Media Group Ltd, Salaba Agenicies Ltd & Michael Rono [2015] Eklr
  • Lalji t/a Vakkep Building Contractors –vs- Casoulsel Ltd [1989] KLR 386
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case