SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kennedy Nyakundi v Powerhive East Africa Limited [2021] KEELRC 555 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 555 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
555
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 555 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePosturePetition for Declaration, Judicial Review, and CompensationCoramKLR Ndolo, Lenaola, Mbaru, Ndolo, Odunga, Ojwang, Rika
Nyakundi was not on probation at the time of termination and his termination was lawful.

Facts

Kennedy Nyakundi was employed by Powerhive East Africa Limited as a Sales and Marketing Manager. His contract of employment commenced on April 30, 2019, with a probation period of six months. The probation was extended by three months on October 14, 2019, and then extended by one month on March 2, 2020. Nyakundi was terminated on March 14, 2020.

Issues

  • Whether Nyakundi was still on probation at the time of termination
  • Whether his termination was unlawful and whether he is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court found that the probationary period lapsed upon the expiry of the three-month extension, and the subsequent letter extending the probation by one month was not legally binding.

Outcome

The petition is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act, 2015
Cases cited (2)
  • Elizabeth Mwikali Mwendwa v Kenya Investment Authority
  • Evans Kiage Onchwari v Hotel Ambassadeur Nairobi
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case