SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Kioko Mwanthi & 12 others v Athi River Shalom Community Hospital (Cause 1062 of 2017) [2021] KEELRC 690 (KLR) (Employment and Labour) (21 October 2021) (Judgment)

[2021] KEELRC 690 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
690
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 690 (KLR)
Decided
21 October 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramMbaru
The Court finds that the claimants were employees of the respondent and that their termination was unfair and unlawful.

Facts

The claimants were employed as cleaners and guards by the respondent from 2010 to 2016. They alleged unfair termination and sought compensation and reinstatement.

Issues

  • Whether a fair procedure was applied in terminating the claimants.
  • Whether the claimants are entitled to the prayers sought.

Reasoning

The Court found that the claimants had a contract of service with the respondent and that the termination was unfair due to lack of notice and reasons.

Outcome

The claimants were awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice, unpaid leave, and damages for unlawful termination.

Orders

  • The respondent is ordered to pay the claimants one month's salary in lieu of notice.
  • The respondent is ordered to pay the claimants unpaid leave.
  • The respondent is ordered to pay the claimants damages for unlawful termination.

Remedies

  • One month's salary in lieu of notice.
  • Unpaid leave.
  • Damages for unlawful termination.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (3)
  • Donald Odeke =vs= Fidelity Security Limited
  • Stanley Mwangi Gachungu & another =vs= Barclays Bank
  • Walter Ogal Anuro =vs= Teachers Service Commission
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case