SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Michael Mackenzie Maingi v Steel Structures Limited [2021] KEELRC 903 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 903 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
903
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 903 (KLR)
Decided
30 September 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramLimo, Mbaru, Nyakundi, Okwany
Holding

The Court dismissed the Claimant's claims for gratuity and outstanding annual leave, finding no contractual justification for the gratuity claim. The Court also dismissed the claim for unpaid September 2016 salary, as the Respondent was ready and willing to pay the terminal dues of Kshs.62,712.

Facts

The Claimant, Michael Mackenzie Maingi, sued his employer, Steel Structures Limited, for terminal dues/benefits after giving notice of retirement. The Claimant sought gratuity pay, outstanding annual leave, and unpaid salary.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.
  2. Whether the Respondent's letter dated 9th September 2016 was contrary to the Claimant's proposal to voluntarily retire and thus amounted to termination without reason and hearing.

Reasoning

The Court ruled that the Claimant's claim for gratuity was unsustainable as there was no contractual justification. The Respondent was ready and willing to pay the terminal dues of Kshs.62,712.

Outcome

The appeal was dismissed.

Orders

  • The Claimant's claims for gratuity and outstanding annual leave were dismissed.
  • The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the terminal dues of Kshs.62,712.

Remedies

  • Payment of Kshs.62,712 in terminal dues.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Retirement Benefits Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Samuel Nyabeta v Dr. Laban Munene
  • St. Patricks Hill School Ltd v Bank of Africa Ltd
  • City Clock Ltd v County Clock Kenya Ltd
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case