SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mercy Kawira Mithika v Kenya Women Microfinance Bank PLC [2021] KEELRC 94 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 94 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
94
Citation
[2021] KEELRC 94 (KLR)
Decided
14 December 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramAburili, Makau, Mbaru, Ndolo, Ongaya, Radido, Rika
The Petitioner's termination was not voluntary and she was subjected to unlawful and unfair termination. The Petitioner is entitled to compensation and refund of terminal dues.

Facts

The Petitioner was employed by the Respondent as a Business Development Officer. She was moved to the Emali Unit and later to the Kiambu Branch. She was subjected to disciplinary proceedings and eventually terminated from her employment.

Issues

  • Whether the termination was voluntary or coerced
  • Whether the Petitioner's rights were violated under the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and the Employment Act of 2007
  • Whether the Petitioner is entitled to damages, compensation, and refund of terminal dues

Reasoning

The Petitioner was subjected to disciplinary proceedings and eventually terminated from her employment. The Petitioner's termination was not voluntary and she was subjected to unlawful and unfair termination. The Petitioner is entitled to compensation and refund of terminal dues.

Outcome

The Petitioner's petition is upheld and the Respondent is ordered to pay compensation and refund terminal dues.

Orders

  • The Respondent is ordered to pay compensation and refund terminal dues to the Petitioner

Remedies

  • Compensation and refund of terminal dues

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act of 2007
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case