SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Clinical Officers v Chairman, Council of Governors & 3 others; Ministry of Labour and Social Protection & another (Interested Parties); Ongwari James Elvis & 15 others (Contemnors) [2022] KEELRC 1070 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 1070 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1070
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 1070 (KLR)
Decided
18 January 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureApplication for contempt against 16 contemnors for disobedience to court orders
Holding

The Court found the contemnors guilty of contempt and ordered them to be punished and committed to civil jail for a period not exceeding six months.

Facts

The Applicant, Kenya Union of Clinical Officers, filed applications against 16 contemnors for contempt of court orders made on 22 February 2021. The orders were related to a strike by health workers in Kisii County. The health workers were dismissed for non-compliance with the court orders.

Issues

  1. Whether the contemnors are guilty of contempt
  2. Whether the Applicant is entitled to the orders sought

Reasoning

The court found the orders clear and binding, and the contemnors had knowledge of the orders. They were also found to have acted deliberately in disobeying the orders.

Outcome

The Court found the contemnors guilty of contempt and ordered them to be punished and committed to civil jail for a period not exceeding six months.

Orders

  • Punish and commit the contemnors to civil jail for a period not exceeding six months for wilful and deliberate disobedience of the court orders

Remedies

  • Deny audience by the court until the contempt is purged

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Mengich t/a Mengich & Co Advocates & Another v Joseph Mabwai & 10 Others [2018] eKLR
  • Contempt in Modem New Zealand
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case