SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Erastus Munywoki Mutua & 144 others v Ready Consultancy Company Limited & another [2022] KEELRC 1134 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 1134 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1134
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 1134 (KLR)
Decided
25 February 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The claimants are not entitled to notice pay or damages for unfair termination as there was no termination of employment. The claimants are not entitled to annual leave pay as they had not earned it. The 1st respondent's counterclaim for one month's pay in lieu of notice is not justified.

Facts

The 1st respondent (Ready Consultancy Company Limited) offered a transfer to the claimants, but the 2nd respondent (the employer) did not terminate the employment relationship.

Issues

  • Whether the claimants are entitled to notice pay and damages for unfair termination.
  • Whether the claimants are entitled to annual leave pay.
  • Whether the 1st respondent's counterclaim for one month's pay in lieu of notice is justified.

Reasoning

The claimants were not terminated, and thus, their claims for notice pay and damages for unfair termination are dismissed. The claimants were not entitled to annual leave pay as they had not earned it. The 1st respondent's counterclaim for one month's pay in lieu of notice is not justified due to the claimants' rejection of the transfer and the 1st respondent's failure to initiate disciplinary action.

Outcome

Judgment for the parties: declaration that the 1st respondent was the sole employer, declaration that there was no unfair or unlawful termination, dismissal of the claimant's suit and the counterclaim, and each party to bear their own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case