SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndegwa v Kenya Railways Corporation (Cause E071 of 2022) [2022] KEELRC 12772 (KLR) (6 October 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 12772 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
12772
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 12772 (KLR)
Decided
6 October 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeDisciplinary ActionPostureRespondent's Motion to Strike Out the SuitCoramMathews N. Nduma
The suit is struck out with respect to all claims and reliefs founded on the surcharge and demotion of the claimant by the respondent.

Facts

The claimant Patrick Ndegwa was demoted from Job Grade 'M4' to 'S1' by the Kenya Railways Corporation on 15th November 2017. He was also charged with embezzlement and computer forgery/fraud. The claimant filed a statement of claim challenging the surcharge of his salary and demotion.

Issues

  • Time Barred for Surcharge and Demotion
  • Suspension Pending Criminal Charges

Reasoning

The claimant's suit is time barred for surcharge and demotion as it was filed more than four years after the cause of action arose. The respondent's suspension of the claimant pending criminal charges does not bar the claimant from filing suit.

Outcome

The suit is struck out.

Orders

  • The suit is struck out with respect to all claims and reliefs founded on the surcharge and demotion of the claimant by the respondent.
  • The rest of the suit to follow its normal course upon appropriate amendment of pleadings.
  • Costs in the cause.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Kenya Railways Corporation Act (Cap 397)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Mrao -vs- First American Bank of Kenya Limited and 2 Others
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case