SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Maya Agricultural Traders Limited v Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Labour Social Security and Services & another (Miscellaneous Application 001 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 12814 (KLR) (6 October 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 12814 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
12814
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 12814 (KLR)
Decided
6 October 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent sought to dismiss the applicant's application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings.CoramDN NDERITU, Wasilwa
The application is dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Facts

The applicant, Maya Agricultural Traders Limited, sought leave to institute judicial review proceedings against the Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Labour Social Security and Services and the Attorney General regarding a notice for labour audit/inspection and non-production of employment records.

Issues

  • Whether the applicant's application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings should be granted.

Reasoning

The court found no evidence of illegal or unlawful actions by the labour officer, and the applicant failed to demonstrate grounds for granting leave to institute judicial review proceedings.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Labour Institutions Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Republic v Chief Magistrate & another ex-parte Tusker Mattresses (2013) eKLR
  • Republic v Kenya Revenue Authority Ex-parte Yaya Towers Limited (2008) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case