SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndiritu v H Young & Company (East Africa) Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E078 of 2020) [2022] KEELRC 13006 (KLR) (27 October 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELRC 13006 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13006
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13006 (KLR)
Decided
27 October 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour Relations AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Chief Magistrate, Milimani Court, NairobiCoramMN NDUMA
The court finds that the claimant was a union member and the respondent had deducted union dues from him. The court upholds the trial court's decision to award the claimant the balance of Kshs 293,145 and orders the respondent to pay interest and costs.

Facts

The claimant was employed as a long-haul driver by the respondent from November 10, 2004, until he resigned on March 29, 2018. The respondent calculated and issued a terminal dues payslip for Kshs 449,343, but later issued a cheque for Kshs 156,198 in part payment. The claimant claimed the balance of Kshs 293,145.

Issues

  • Whether the claimant was a union member and entitled to gratuity
  • Whether the respondent was estopped from reneging on a promise to pay the claimant Kshs 449,343 upon his resignation

Reasoning

The court held that the claimant was a union member and the respondent had deducted union dues, thus the claimant was entitled to the full amount of Kshs 449,343. The court found that the respondent was estopped from reneging on the promise to pay the claimant the full amount upon his resignation.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed, judgment in favor of the respondent

Orders

  • Award of Kshs 293,145 to the respondent
  • Interest at court rates from the date of the trial court's judgment till payment in full
  • Costs to the respondent

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Coastal Bottles Limited -vs- Kimathi Mithika (2018) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case