Njoroge v Ongicho p/a Ongicho and Company Advocates (Miscellaneous Application 148 of 2019) [2022] KEELRC 13016 (KLR) (27 October 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 13016
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 13016 (KLR)
- Decided
- 27 October 2022
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent/Applicant seeks orders to admit new advocates, stay orders, set aside previous orders, and allow the applicant to file responses and be heard on merit.CoramMATHEWS N. NDUMA
Holding
The application lacks merit and is dismissed with costs.
Facts
The applicant/respondent failed to pay a decretal sum of Kshs 2,980,000 to the applicant/respondent despite the same being paid into the applicant’s account. The applicant/respondent was granted a stay of execution but did not file an appeal. The applicant/respondent also failed to respond to applications for execution of judgment and decree by committal to jail.
Issues
- Admit new advocates
- Stay orders
- Set aside previous orders
- Allow the applicant to file responses and be heard on merit
Reasoning
The court finds the applicant in willful default to satisfy payment of the decretal sum and is in contempt of the orders of the trial court. The judgment is not subject to any stay orders or pending appeal.
Outcome
Dismissed with costs
Authorities cited
Cases cited (2)
- Mawani -vs- Mawani [1977] eKLR 159
- Mbogo and Another -vs- Shah [1968] EA 93
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…