Cain v Elsek and Elsek (K) Limited (Cause 1953 of 2015) [2022] KEELRC 13094 (KLR) (7 November 2022) (Judgment)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 13094
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 13094 (KLR)
- Decided
- 7 November 2022
Summary at a glance
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant seeks orders for payment of dues and compensation, Respondent denies employment relationshipCoramMA ONYANGO
The Court found that an employment relationship existed between the Claimant and the Respondent, and the Claimant is entitled to the prayers sought.
Facts
Claimant worked as a Financial Advisor for Respondent from January to March 2015. He was not paid salary and was asked to return a car. The parties communicated via email, indicating an intention to enter into an employment contract.
Issues
- Whether there was an employment relationship between the Claimant and the Respondent
- Whether the employment relationship was breached
- Whether the Claimant is entitled to the prayers sought
Reasoning
The Court considered the email correspondence and evidence, finding that the parties had a meeting of minds regarding an employment contract. The Claimant's performance was considered as executing his consideration.
Outcome
Claimant's claims upheld
Orders
- An order directing the Respondent to immediately and unconditionally pay the Claimant's dues for the period between January and April, 2015 being the sum of US$40,000.00
- An award for appropriate compensation for breach of contract by the Respondent for twelve months’ salary being the sum of US$ 120,000.00
- Damages for breach of contract
- Exemplary damages
- All other benefits that the Claimant is entitled to
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…