SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kamuti v Freight Wings Limited (Cause 1199 of 2018) [2022] KEELRC 13192 (KLR) (11 November 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELRC 13192 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13192
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13192 (KLR)
Decided
11 November 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramSC RUTTO
Holding

The court found that the termination was unfair and in violation of the law.

Facts

The claimant, John Kamuti, was employed by Freight Wings Limited from February 1, 2011, and was promoted to the position of supervisor-warehouse, maintenance section. He was terminated on April 27, 2018, without any prior warning or misconduct being reported.

Issues

  1. Whether there was a fair and valid reason to terminate the claimant's employment.
  2. Whether the claimant was subjected to a fair process prior to being terminated.
  3. Is the counterclaim justifiable?
  4. Is the claimant entitled to the reliefs sought?

Reasoning

The court held that the respondent failed to provide a valid and fair reason for terminating the claimant's employment, as required by the Employment Act.

Outcome

The claimant was awarded Kshs.271,600 in damages, including compensation for unutilized leave days and interest.

Orders

  • Payment of Kshs.271,600 in damages.
  • Payment of interest on the amount awarded.
  • The respondent to bear the costs of the claim.

Remedies

  • Compensatory damages
  • Salary for the month of April, 2018
  • One month's salary in lieu of notice
  • Salary in lieu of leave days earned but not taken

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case