SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyamai v Badar Hardware Limited (Miscellaneous Application E058 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 13248 (KLR) (17 November 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELRC 13248 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13248
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13248 (KLR)
Decided
17 November 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent opposed, Court allowed the applicationCoramAGNES KITIKU NZEI
Court adopts the Director's assessment and orders Respondent to pay KSh 1,999,222 to Claimant, with interest from the date of judgment.

Facts

Claimant was a truck driver for Respondent who was attacked by robbers in 2017, resulting in severe injuries. The Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services assessed compensation of KSh 1,999,222, which Respondent refused to pay.

Issues

  • Jurisdiction of the Court to enforce Director's compensation assessment
  • Employer's obligation to pay assessed compensation

Reasoning

The Court found it has jurisdiction to enforce the Director's assessment and orders, as the Respondent did not object to the assessment and refused to pay.

Outcome

Claimant's application granted

Orders

  • Award of the Director's assessment of KSh 1,999,222 to Claimant
  • Award of interest on the decreed sum at Court rates

Remedies

  • Payment of compensation and interest

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case