SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Murithi v SGS Kenya Limited (Cause 328 of 2018) [2022] KEELRC 1325 (KLR) (13 May 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELRC 1325 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1325
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 1325 (KLR)
Decided
13 May 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSummary Dismissal ReviewPostureAppeal from summary dismissalCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
Holding

The summary dismissal was unfair and the respondent failed to maintain a sexual harassment policy.

Facts

Claimant was dismissed on 07.03.2018, after being suspended for 7 days. Allegations of sexual harassment and extortion were made against him.

Issues

  1. Whether the summary dismissal was fair
  2. Whether the respondent failed to maintain a sexual harassment policy

Reasoning

The Court held that the claimant was not afforded an opportunity to attend the hearing with a colleague as per section 41 of the Act. The respondent did not institute a sexual harassment policy as required by the Employment Act.

Outcome

Claimant awarded full compensation of 12 months’ salaries, declaration of unfair dismissal, and costs of the suit.

Orders

  • Respondent to issue a sexual harassment policy by 01.09.2022
  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs. 1, 123, 345.00 by 01.07.2022
  • Respondent to deliver claimant’s certificate of service by 01.07.2022
  • Claimant to be awarded costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Declaration of unfair dismissal
  • Compensation of 12 months’ salaries
  • Certificate of service
  • Costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Sexual Harassment Policy
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case