SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Apex Steel Limited v Nyagaresi (Appeal 7 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 13290 (KLR) (28 November 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELRC 13290 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
13290
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13290 (KLR)
Decided
28 November 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the L. Kassan Senior Principal MagistrateCoramMA ONYANGO
The appeal is allowed, the judgment of the trial court is set aside, and the suit is dismissed with costs to the Appellant.

Facts

Apex Steel Limited filed a lawsuit against Cyrus Nyagaresi alleging injury sustained while performing lawful duties. The Respondent claimed negligence and breach of employment terms, seeking damages and costs.

Issues

  • Whether the trial court erred in finding an employment relationship between the parties
  • Whether the trial court erred in finding the Appellant wholly liable for the Respondent's injury
  • Whether the Appellant's appeal should be granted

Reasoning

The Appellant's appeal is upheld as there was no evidence to support the existence of an employment relationship between the parties, thus the Appellant cannot be held liable for the Respondent's injury.

Outcome

Appeal allowed, judgment of the trial court set aside, suit dismissed with costs to the Appellant

Orders

  • Judgment of the trial court set aside
  • Suit dismissed with costs to the Appellant

Remedies

  • Costs to the Appellant

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Kenya Nut Company Limited v Sarah Nanjala Wambogo [2019] eKLR
  • Abok James Odera t/a A.J Odera & Associates v John Patrick Machira t/a Machira & Co. Advocates [2013] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case