SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Okinda Omondi v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Sports, Culture & Heritage & another; Cabinet Secretary, National Treasury & Planning & 3 others (Interested Parties) [2022] KEELRC 133 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 133 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
133
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 133 (KLR)
Decided
28 April 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabor DisputePosturePetition for InjunctionCoramLINNET NDOLO
Holding

The Court restrains the Respondents from proceeding with the vacancy notice and suspends it until further orders.

Facts

The Petitioner, Okinda Omondi, seeks an injunction against the Respondents, Cabinet Secretary and National Treasury, to stop them from proceeding with a vacancy notice for the position of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Sports, Arts & Social Development Fund.

Issues

  1. Authority to declare vacancy
  2. Violation of Constitution and law
  3. Violation of Public Finance Management (Sports, Arts and Social Development Fund) Regulations, 2018

Reasoning

The Court finds that the Respondents violated the Constitution, law, and regulations by not consulting the Public Service Commission when advertising the position of CEO. The Petitioner has demonstrated a prima facie case and irreparable injury would result from allowing the process to continue.

Outcome

The Petitioner's Notice of Motion succeeds.

Orders

  • Respondents restrained from proceeding with the vacancy notice
  • Vacancy notice suspended until further orders

Remedies

  • Injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • State Corporations Act
  • Public Finance Management (Sports, Arts and Social Development Fund) Regulations, 2018
  • Mwongozo Code of Governance for State Corporations
  • Human Resource Policies and Procedures Manual for the Public Service
Cases cited (2)
  • Mrao v First American Bank of Kenya & 2 others [2003] eKLR
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd (1973) E.A
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case